8Greta Van Susteren
5The Lead With Jake Tapper
? >> absolutely. i heard dana rohrabacher speak yesterday and he definitely touched base with what is going on with china. the idea of free trade within the country, regardless of how absolutely despicable their behavior is justified and we did this before. i think that our guests would let you know henry ford and other american businessmen in the 1930s were enamored with the german miracle of turning around this care. of course they took away and turned and weapon resistance aimed at the united states and our allies. so when you do free trade with criminals, you're not doing anyone any good in the long run. >> my name is robin and i am from howard payne university in texas. and my economic development costs, we read a book about western imperialism and how the u.s. and great britain kind of imposed the western views on other countries. and it talks about state-owned enterprises and how those can be beneficial in some cases. in your opinion is there ever a time if they don't have a price can be beneficial, you know, at least to get it started and is it ever possible that the private owned.
an hour left in our program. mark in dana point, california, you've been very patient. please, go ahead. >> caller: melanie, you have a number of interesting beliefs that need to be explored. however, you lose credibility with the scientific community when you claim that the scientific method was not used to establish the facts about global warming as caused by humans' burning of fossil fuels. the scientific method was used extensively in the 1970s and the '80s, and the predictions started coming true in the early '90s. and the only claim that you can make against the scientists in this area is that they understated the significance of this problem. and today we have a situationing where 97% of the top 200 climate scientists are diametrically opposed to your beliefs. your beliefs are parallelled by sarah palin from the state of alaska and senator inhofe, the state of oklahoma, tw states that economies -- two states that economies are based on burning fossil fuels. you need to rethis think this so -- rethink this saw that you get -- so that you get on the right side of this issue.
Fetching more results